by Daniel Curtis, R.D.
At a sports nutrition seminar I attended some time back, a woman who was a marathon competitor and the author of several books on sports nutrition gave a lecture on optimal nutrition for various sports, including carb loading, adequate hydration and carb snacks to eat during endurance events. She presented her material well and supported it with well-designed studies.
Suddenly, in the middle of her presentation, however, she flashed a slide of former Mr. Olympia Chris Dickerson. The photo was great, but her subsequent comments regarding bodybuilding nutrition were not. Her take on it was this: "When a young man comes in to see me regarding nutrition and bodybuilding, I simply emphasize that all he needs are well-balanced meals. Using protein pow -ders and all those other supplements is a waste of time and money and won't add beneficial results. If he's adamant that he must have something in addition to balanced meals, I tell him to buy dry nonfat milk and add it to his beverages. I do this to pacify him, as it isn't necessary. The literature shows that bodybuilders really don't need any more protein than the RDA [recommended dietary allowance] of 0.8 to 1.0 grams per kilogram of bodyweight per day."
For a 154-pound man, that's 70 grams of protein per day. Obviously, the woman knew less about bodybuilding and nutrition than most bodybuilders know about marathons.
The sad part was, the auditorium was packed with dietitians, physical therapists, sports trainers and other health professionals, who took her words as gospel.
Is that really what "the literature shows"? Let's review it and see.
My favorite study, although not recent, was reported in the highly respected American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (28:29-35; 1975). It involved men performing "heavy physical activity," including isometric exercises, treadmill sessions, stationary bike riding and other "sports activities," during a 40-day period.
One group took in 100 grams of protein per day; the other, 197 grams. The calories were the same for both groups.
What were the results? The researchers reported that the additional protein "did not enhance physical performance." That means the men who ate the higher-protein diet didn't walk longer on the treadmill, ride further on the bike or apply more pressure on the isometric exercises. The study concluded that consuming additional protein failed to improve sports performance and so was "unnecessary." Nevertheless, it did have an interesting "side effect." The researchers went on to report that the men who ate the high-protein diet did "increase body protein stores and muscle mass."
Oops! I guess the sports nutrition author forgot to mention that while extra protein won't help those young men she counsels lift heavier weights or enable them to train longer, it will let them build bigger muscles. (Of course, the irony is, that's why they come to her in the first place—they want bigger muscles.)
That's what success means to bodybuilders— more muscle mass. The guy with 20-inch arms couldn't care less about the guy who can curl 20 more pounds than he can but has arms that are only 17 inches. That's the reason bodybuilders never win the World's Strongest Man Competition, though they often place higher than most other sports superstars. The winners are usually the guys with big muscles and big bellies—in other words, the strength athletes.
If your goal is simply to be stronger, then use low repetitions and heavy weights and eat like a horse, without worrying about muscle size and symmetry. If your primary goal is bigger muscles without excess fat (you'll also increase your strength to a significant degree), then the literature clearly states that you do need to increase protein intake. In the study cited above, the group that gained more muscle mass ate twice as much protein as the control group. They didn't do it just by eating more food. In order to reach the high protein
A positive nitrogen balance indicates that the body is taking in more protein (nitrogen) than it excretes. You must have a positive nitrogen balance before muscle growth can begin, as your body builds the new muscle with the extra.
intake without unnecessary fat and sugar, they used Casec (a milk protein isolate—not powdered milk) and Meritene, an early protein supplement that was often used in hospitals.
A more recent study that was reported in the International Journal of Sports Nutrition (1:127-145; 1991) came to a very different conclusion than the 1975 study: "Present data indicate that strength athletes should consume 1.5 to 2.0 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, which is 188 to 250 percent of the RDA for protein."
A positive nitrogen balance indicates that the body is taking in more protein (nitrogen) than it excretes. You must have a positive nitrogen balance before muscle growth can begin, as your body builds the new muscle with the extra. There's some speculation that as positive nitrogen balance increases, so do muscle size and strength. The last article suggested that "perhaps, by maintaining a more positive nitrogen balance, protein synthesis would be further enhanced, leading to larger and stronger muscles." It pointed to a study that involved elite Romanian weightlifters who increased muscle mass by 6 percent and strength by 5 percent when their protein intake was increased from 225 percent of the RDA to 438 percent.
Why have the study results differed so much about the amount of protein necessary for muscle growth? According to the authors of that last article, "Exercise intensity appears critical and may explain why some studies have not observed an increased protein requirement."
As for the frequently mentioned health hazards—including the claim that excess protein can cause liver or kidney damage: "Actually, except in preexisting liver or kidney abnormalities, there is little documented evidence of health problems due to a high protein intake In an active
report that th men who ate the high-protein diet did "increase body protein stores and muscle mass.
individual the fate of ingested protein is likely quite different than in a sedentary individual."
So the scientific literature doesn't clearly state that bodybuilders don't need additional protein to build muscle mass. In fact, it clearly states the opposite—that bodybuilders looking to increase muscle size need significantly more protein than nonbodybuilders.
To tell people to simply eat more at meals is very ambiguous. They may eat more fats and carbohydrates, in which case their muscles won't grow but their waists certainly will. Remember that in the first study cited above, both groups of subjects ate the same calories but one got double the protein with that calorie level, and they were the ones who gained mass.
The bottom line is that bodybuilders need more protein, and supplements like protein powders do help. You also want to be leery of so-called nutrition experts who aren't familiar with bodybuilding and think that performance in bodybuilding equates to performance in other sports. In bodybuilding, performance means big, symmetrical muscles—and for that very reason bodybuilding nutrition is a different animal from nutrition for other sports.
The researchers reported that the additional protein "did not enhance physical performance." Nevertheless, it did have an interesting "side effect." The researchers went on to
Was this article helpful?